F-89 Emergency Action Plan (EAPD) / Fire Safety Director (FSD) Practice Exam

Is "defend in place" a recognized concept in emergency action plans?

1. True, it is a common strategy

2. False, it's often confused with "shelter in place"

3. True, it is only used in fire scenarios

4. False, it is not included in EAP systems

The correct answer is: False, it's often confused with "shelter in place"

The concept of "defend in place" is indeed recognized within emergency action plans, but it is often misunderstood and can be confused with "shelter in place." This confusion arises because both strategies involve taking protective action within a building or designated area rather than evacuating to another location. "Defend in place" typically refers to a situation where occupants are instructed to remain in a safe location within the building during an emergency, such as a fire, while responders take action to manage the situation, protecting those inside from dangers outside. This strategy emphasizes maintaining safety without immediate evacuation, more relevant in scenarios where leaving the building could expose individuals to greater risk. In contrast, "shelter in place" usually applies to various emergencies, such as severe weather or chemical spills, where individuals are advised to stay indoors to avoid external hazards. Therefore, understanding this distinction and recognizing that "defend in place" is a legitimate emergency response strategy clarifies its role within EAPs and underlines the importance of proper training and communication during emergencies.