F-89 Emergency Action Plan (EAPD) / Fire Safety Director (FSD) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the F-89 Emergency Action Plan / Fire Safety Director Test with comprehensive flashcards and multiple choice questions featuring hints and explanations. Ace your F-89 exam today!

Practice this question and more.


What should the emergency action plan director consider during an evacuation in the event of an intentional bombing?

  1. Evacuating immediately

  2. The presence of additional explosives

  3. Moving to the roof

  4. Allowing occupants to gather personal belongings

The correct answer is: The presence of additional explosives

During an evacuation in the event of an intentional bombing, the most critical consideration is the presence of additional explosives. The emergency action plan director must assess the situation for potential secondary devices or bombs that may have been planted to injure or harm anyone who is evacuating. This awareness is vital for ensuring the safety of all individuals in the vicinity. While immediate evacuation is necessary in emergencies, it needs to be executed with caution, particularly in scenarios involving potential threats of further explosives. If there is a chance that additional devices are present, the director must make decisions that minimize risk during the evacuation process. Moving to the roof can expose individuals to further danger from the blast or may not be the safest location depending on the building's structure and surrounding area. Allowing occupants to gather personal belongings could create unnecessary delays and expose them to further risk when prompt evacuation is required. Therefore, prioritizing awareness of potential additional explosives is crucial for maintaining safety in such scenarios.