Who is correct when there's a change in incident particulars affecting EAP provisions?

The choice that states the deputy EAPD should change provisions if necessary is correct because it acknowledges the collaborative nature of incident management and the necessity for adapting to new information or changes in the environment. Emergency situations often require flexibility and prompt adjustments to the Emergency Action Plan (EAP) to address shifting variables such as the size, scope, or nature of the incident.

The deputy EAPD plays a vital role in this process, as they are trained and empowered to respond to changing circumstances. Their ability to assess the ongoing situation and implement necessary changes to the EAP ensures that responses are effective and aligned with current conditions, which is essential for the safety and well-being of all involved.

The other options suggest a more static approach, where either the EAPD alone is deemed infallible or there's an unrealistic expectation of a static situation, neither of which reflects the dynamic nature of emergency management. This flexibility and situational awareness are critical for effective operational response during incidents.