Why would it be correct for the EAPD to relocate tenants to upper floors during a chemical emergency?

Prepare for the F-89 Emergency Action Plan / Fire Safety Director Test with comprehensive flashcards and multiple choice questions featuring hints and explanations. Ace your F-89 exam today!

Relocating tenants to upper floors during a chemical emergency is appropriate when the chemical in question is heavier than air. Chemicals that are denser than air tend to accumulate at lower levels, thus posing a greater risk to individuals who are situated closer to the ground. By moving tenants to upper floors, where the concentration of the hazardous chemical would be significantly lower, their safety is enhanced. This tactic serves to minimize exposure to dangerous fumes or vapors that could cause harm, making it a logical and effective response in such emergency situations.

In contrast, during a chemical emergency involving substances that are lighter than air, such as gases that rise, relocating individuals to upper floors would not offer the same level of protection since those chemicals would not be confined to lower levels. Understanding the physical properties of the chemical involved is essential for making informed decisions during such an emergency, thereby ensuring the safety of tenants.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy